Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TorontoMovement/Archive

07 October 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The sudden appearance of this SPA account to !vote keep at Articles for deletion/Amar Kanwal is suspect enough. However, please compare the identical, convoluted and highly idiosyncratic writing styles. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Obvious sock, CU isn't needed. While meatpupptry is possible, socking is way more likley due to style similarities and the fact that Howtoinfojohn is obviously not a new user, even if both forget to sign.  Two weeks for master, indef for sock. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 00:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Reopened because of the unblock request of the master in this case. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 11:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Hersfold did a CU, found it POSSIBLE, declined unblock request based on totality of circumstances. See blocked master's talk page.  Closing again. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 18:56, 7 October 2012 (UTC)