Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tranngocnhatminh/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

CU evidence has never been so clear. In addition, behavioral evidence is tight. This started with Eggmane6678's remarkable, huge edit to OK Computer, which I quickly found had been made before by a disruptive user who also was interested in changing genres--note that almost all accounts have the same edit summaries. I do not think that the account I placed this under is the oldest one: this is a serial, compulsive genre warrior who uses throwaway accounts to make (usually) a limited number of edits. When they run in trouble they move on to the next one. But this is as deep as I could go; I did not run CU on all the individual accounts to see if there were more IP addresses and more accounts--perhaps one of you feels inclined to do so. Anyway, it's late, and this brought me over my limit for keystrokes. I did not tag these accounts though I blocked them all--please feel free to check whether I did them all correctly. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 05:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. GABgab 21:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, hang on a sec., it seems that is only blocked for 31 hours. Thanks, GABgab 01:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks GAB. I need to have "indefinite" as a default, but I'm not smart enough to do that. Drmies (talk) 01:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)