Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Transclusionzombie/Archive

Report date January 24 2009, 10:46 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets:

Previously blocked for sockpuppetry on several accounts. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 10:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by -- btphelps (talk) (contribs)


 * Recently engaged in malicious editing of two user pages here and here. These two users have both been subject to closely related personal attacks by Waraji. Previous edits resulted in Arbitration . Evidence of previous sockpuppetry resulted in blocking several accounts. Given the nature of the most recent malicious edits, the content of the edits which is closely related to the previous uncivil and hostile behavior by Waraji, it seems very likely this individual is now engaging in the same behavior without creating an account. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 20:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 10:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * In order to justify a CheckUser being ran you need to provided conclusive evidence via diff's. Tiptoety  talk 19:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Requests which would have the effect of revealing an editor's IP address are usually declined; that said, Waraji seemed worth checking, and is a ✅ match for the following:
 * The above are already blocked (some of them had been discussed at the admin noticeboards, looks like). – Luna Santin  (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above are already blocked (some of them had been discussed at the admin noticeboards, looks like). – Luna Santin  (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above are already blocked (some of them had been discussed at the admin noticeboards, looks like). – Luna Santin  (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above are already blocked (some of them had been discussed at the admin noticeboards, looks like). – Luna Santin  (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Tiptoety talk 17:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Report date March 28 2009, 19:12 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Vandalized my user page here on March 28. Previously found to have engaged in sockpuppetry and vandalism as concluded here using these aliases:



and vandalism using anonymous IPs on several other occasions during mid-March:


 * here
 * here
 * here
 * here
 * here
 * here.

Same pattern of behavior throughout with similar disruptive vandalism.
 * Evidence submitted by -- btphelps (talk) (contribs)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

From the linked differences above, there are three IPs:
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments



Edits by numbers 1, 2, and 3 are nearly identical to those of. I also believe OrsonPratt and Waraji to be related in that they both expressed a strong interest in LGBT issues. See contributions for details. The IPs have not edited in about 10 days so no need to block right now. Blocked. Clerks please tag. KnightLago (talk) 22:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

blocked and tagged. Mayalld (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions