Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Transportfan/Archive

11 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts participated in the same discussion, and both are editing the same image: File:Simcoe Road 89 sign.png.

These are obviously the same editor, but it is not clear whether sanctions should be applied. Because I am not neutral to the discussion I cited, I think it would be best to have an independent admin making the call. Rschen7754 06:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: The editor is also editing the same page via IP:   --Rschen7754 06:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Regarding my dual account, I didn't have any malicious intent, and the second account was started as I half-forgot the old account and didn't think the name was nearly the same. The old Transportfan account can be deleted. Transportfan70 (talk) 18:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I know that has notifed you of this SPI. Normally, you are not required to comment here. However, in this instance I need a response to the allegations, some of which you've already admitted to, both regarding the two named accounts and the IP editing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I blocked Transportfan., either the user has a significant measure of incompetence or they are a very good actor. At this point, I'm taking them at their word, although it makes sense (to me) only if they really don't know what they're doing. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)