Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trendae/Archive

13 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

SPA Qadauae created the page Saeed Al Nazari (about a 22 year old person of dubious notability) four days ago. SPA IP 2.49.108.140 yesterday began editing it in the same manner, and deleted maintenance tags as well. Both were asked yesterday if they were connected to the subject. Whereupon today SPA Trendae edited the same article in similar fashion, also removing the maintenance tags. --Epeefleche (talk) 08:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Epeefleche (talk) 08:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ Note that is the older account, so this report should be moved there.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked 5 days, which covers the remaining duration of the AfD. Blocked  indef as a puppet of Trendae, and tagged as such.  The closing clerk will need to move this page as appropriate. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 10:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

24 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Block evasion. First edit was to create Draft:Saeed Al Nazari as a draft, containing a paste of his LinkedIn. When this is deleted, he asks why at User talk:Diannaa. Then he simply skips attempting a draft, and creates Saeed Al Nazari, who is incidentally now a DMC alumnus. Dai Pritchard (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The master in this case should have been changed before now. I've done that. Also, it was the master's IP who created the draft, not the named account. In any event, I've indeffed the new puppet based on duck and adjusted the tag. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * , does Trendae need to be blocked?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I elected not to block the account. It was blocked for five days in May 2014 at the time of the first investigation, and even after the block expired, the person never has used that account again. I don't have strong feelings about it, though, and wouldn't object to a block. Do you think we should block it?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, since the account is abandoned, I'd say there is no need to block.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:34, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Righto, then feel free to archive it. BTW, thanks for fixing the tag.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)