Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trucker220/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Clear coordinated editing on Death of Regan Russell. Linguist111talk 02:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Probably a case of WP:MEAT if not WP:SOCK. Linguist111talk 14:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

OPP64 is not my account. Check the IP. Its another concerned person who wants correct information posted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trucker220 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * There is strong behavioral evidence that OPP64 and Trucker220 are the same user or heavily associated so even without a CU check I think they could be blocked. Both accounts are single purpose and have edited only the Regan Russell article or talk-page. Both are new accounts, one was created on the 24 December, the other 25 December. Both make the same arguments and call references on the article 'biased' or written by 'animal activists'. Both accounts only edit from a mobile. Lastly both accounts make the same edit summaries using the word "facts" which is an unusual thing to do. Compare or  to,  etc. Psychologist Guy (talk) 14:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not convinced. I see new users copying edit summaries all the time like that. I've done it when I wasn't sure of the norms for a new type of edit. Jmill1806 (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Please note that I just have indefinitely blocked OPP64 (who was already temporarily blocked for edit warring) for making what I perceive to be a clear legal threat on their talk page. No comment on the merits of the SPI case and/or CU request. Girth Summit  (blether)  11:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I guess there won't be meaningful results when CU is already being asked for by the accused, but this is a case where confirmed sockpuppetry would result in a block and coincidence would result in a simple warning. Requesting CU. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are technically . Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, – closing with a custom warning to . ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)