Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TrueLightWiki/Archive

25 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious duck adding unsourced POV content to Iglesia ni Cristo. See e.g. the master's edits here, here, here, here and here. Only a half hour later, we have this edit by the new account. /wiae  /tlk  06:14, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Editing to add a second account that has been editing the same talk page. /wiae  /tlk  13:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
I created TrueLightWiki and contribute to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iglesia_ni_Cristo

While i contribute and editing, i mention references and valid sources. I even wrote in the Talk Page. This user /tlk  request or blocked my account, this is a false block. I then create a new account and according to valid sources and references i edit the article correctly to represent everyone and not only the few. That's why we have a free encyclopedia, the wikipedia. To mention that i didn't delete information, but i only add to make the article better. You can check the article, talk page, and my talk page too. Also check the aggressiveness of the user /wiae   /tlk  which seems to take this personally, and this actions violate Wikipedia rules. TrulyLightWiki (talk) 07:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Very strong behavioural evidence along with the similarity in username and user pages created. Mkdw talk 17:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

28 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edits to Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo, user name is a dead giveaway. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

29 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same posting as main account, similar username, same pattern RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I've added a second account that's reinstating the content on the talk page, and that seems to be impersonating me. /wiae   /tlk  19:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Not a socketpuppet, they delete TALK page information and block my user account because i want to contribute with information on TALK page. Check the logs. WikiTrueLN (talk) 18:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Obvious sock who has now taken to posting the same content on my talk page repeatedly and spamming POV/copyrighted content on the Iglesia ni Cristo talk page. /wiae  /tlk  19:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

And now adding yet another account who has taken to editing the talk page of the admin who secured the Iglesia ni Cristo talk page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Too many accounts being created in short time span. I'm endorsing a sleepers check.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked the unblocked account and tagged all including retagging the master. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked the unblocked account and tagged all including retagging the master. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked the unblocked account and tagged all including retagging the master. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked the unblocked account and tagged all including retagging the master. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

07 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

WP:DUCK accounts who post the same type of copyright infringing content to Talk:Iglesia ni Cristo and reverse actions made from blocking admins. Although I blocked them based on Duck, I'm requesting a sleeper check. Diffs:    w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 19:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The two blocked accounts are ✅. I adjusted the tags. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)