Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truesight/Archive

11 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Mr. Truesight has a very limited number of edits, mainly Rusk documents, Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East and Liancourt Rocks dispute. More or less disappearing at 27-2-2012 (one late edit 14-4-2012). Between 1 and 4 April the SPA account Y00tu was active, mainly for POV-pushing and editwarring on Rusk documents and Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East. This ended with a block. On 11 August 2012 the account Ejwcun registered and started POV-pushing and editwarring at Rusk documents. Amazingly, using all kind of pages I have never heard from, correctly applying templates. Alltogether, that gives me the feeling that this is just one user. The Banner talk 18:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Defending myself against claims
 * What ? I'm not. I checked rusk document page, and i found it as biased. Then, I checked history of article and i found some user delete entire section. I created this account. I recovered it. That mean, I am automatically belong someongelse account ? I believe this is completely unfair treatment. Check me if you want. but I'm not.--Ejwcun (talk) 18:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Looking at the edits; Quack, Quack,. Mdann52 (talk) 19:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * What is the duck and quack quack ? --Ejwcun (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The duck test The Banner talk 19:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I still don't know what is that mean. --Ejwcun (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I was formally request someone's help. Is that the bad impression to you ? seems like a no one care about me. I feel like this is group bullying. I feel very unfair treatment. I need help from administrator like you. I requested some help and guidance, unbiased judge, suddenly i become a bad guy. Is it really impossible anything agaisnt to one administrator's POV edit ?--Ejwcun (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not. How about check user of Truesight. I checked history of article and i found some user delete entire section. I recovered it. --Ejwcun (talk) 20:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * When you filed the report at the administrators' noticeboard, you also invited scrutiny of your own edits. That's the impartial thing to do: examine the situation fairly from all perspectives and not bias it based on who filed the report (first). —C.Fred (talk) 20:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Really ? I feel this impression. I formally request police's help. police suddenly says "you are bad guy. whatever, you are guilty.!" I contact with police because i need a help. Everyone blame me. I really shocked about this. because i did nothing wrong. This was a unexpected shock, really. --Ejwcun (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * To use the analogy, if you go to the police to report that your weed has been stolen, don't expect them to let you go free. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Is this culture of english wikipedia ? I feel here is a very closed society. If anybody join it, he/she automatically become a "suspect", and guilty. Is this culture of english wikipedia ? Nobody think this problem ? --Ejwcun (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checkuser note: Truesight and Y00tu are stale for checkuser (no edits within the past several months). Need to resolve based on other evidence. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Per NYB and blocks, declining CU. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  22:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Truesight and Ejwcun have been indefblocked by on 11 August 2012. The other account Y00tu is already blocked since April 2012. De728631 (talk) 13:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)