Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TrulsT90/Archive

22 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Today, in nominated the article NHH Symposium for deletion (Articles for deletion/NHH Symposium). It did not surprise me that the single interest account user:Truls90 was against the nomination, as he/she had edited the article earlier. But what surprised me was the appearence of user:TheCorrectomundo. Although registered only after, she/he was perfectly knowledgeable about the need for sources, knew that sources do not need to be in English and knew perfectly how to add sources to the article. That is rather unbelievable knowledge for somebody who has only joined Wikipedia just minutes before. (Most newcomers struggle with correctly adding references) Interestingly, both Truls90 and TheCorrectomundo failed to sigh their edit to the AfD.

To my opinion, somebody is trying to convince the world that there is more interest in the Article on AfD than the truth is, what in my opinion is misusing the system. The Banner talk 19:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm almost positive that it's a sock, given that both accounts didn't sign and that the second account fixed typos of the first account's comments. (1) However, a check would be helpful to be absolutely sure. Mike V  •  Talk  03:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Technically, doesn't look like it. . Courcelles 05:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, can't say I'm not surprised. I'm going to close this then with no action taken. Mike V  •  Talk  02:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)