Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TruthorDuty/Archive

27 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

the username connections are obvious. As are his Edits to the talk page and article. Using undeclared sock accounts to edit the same article at the same time is a violation of policy. He first tagged the article as not neutral with the first account and then adding multiple citation need tags with the second account, including adding them to cited information and deleted cited information and sources.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boxer_Rebellion&diff=prev&oldid=523971941

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boxer_Rebellion&diff=prev&oldid=524847179

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boxer_Rebellion&diff=prev&oldid=523970712

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boxer_Rebellion&diff=prev&oldid=524312664 Rajmaan (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * To little surprise: ✅ with a sleeper: &mdash; Coren (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I've blocked all three accounts indefinitely because it appears that they were all created solely for the purpose of disruptive editing and sockpuppetry. Closed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:30, 27 November 2012 (UTC)