Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthseekers666/Archive

Evidence submitted by Tedder
WP:DUCK rants from IP and user, and the IP put their rants on the blocked userpage. I blocked the IP for now, but want some SPI confirmation. Diffs:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Truthseekers666&diff=prev&oldid=347351341
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Truthseekers666&diff=prev&oldid=347427152

More available, but I'm out of battery life, so ask if more is needed. tedder (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Looks good to me. Is there anything else missing here? –MuZemike 03:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I just wanted it to be done officially- in other words, not use my untrained SPI eye to connect the IP, and it also means this report exists in the archives. tedder (talk) 05:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Quack, quack! Ted, its time for the next itinerary on our list please. *grin* (PS: Note I've tagged them on your behalf!)--Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 05:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tagging and such, and thanks for letting me fly DUCK Air. tedder (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2010 (UTC)