Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthtell9986/Archive

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ the following are the same:


 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 20:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: this was created based on findings at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive658. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

10 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Identical edits to the same articles all promoting Central European Waste Management including changing image descriptions for images uploaded by a reputable editor who appears to be inactive at present. No sources or references given for changes  Velella  Velella Talk 11:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Note that the company "Central European Waste Management" appears to be a hoax. There are some spoof press releases on the web, but no solid references, and the web addresses quoted are false.  Similarly the predecessor companies quoted in the "press releases" have no apparent WP:RS. - David Biddulph (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * And was another in the collection. - David Biddulph (talk) 15:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, that account has been tagged appropriately. It's also in the archives. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This guy has been been here before - see this section. Anyway, ✅ the following:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on Tnxman's previous findings at ANI, I've moved this case to Truthtell9986 and will update accordingly. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, so I built the archive from the previous ANI thread. And I (along with Edgar181) have blocked and tagged all the socks appropriately. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on Tnxman's previous findings at ANI, I've moved this case to Truthtell9986 and will update accordingly. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, so I built the archive from the previous ANI thread. And I (along with Edgar181) have blocked and tagged all the socks appropriately. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on Tnxman's previous findings at ANI, I've moved this case to Truthtell9986 and will update accordingly. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, so I built the archive from the previous ANI thread. And I (along with Edgar181) have blocked and tagged all the socks appropriately. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

21 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Filing per request at WP:AN. Per the request: ''The modus operandi includes references to "Central European Waste Management" and "Frederick von Strasser", but the succession of press releases last month seem to be the only internet references, and the predecessor companies' names also appear fictitious, so I believe the whole thing to be a spoof. Regardless of the vandalism, the string of edits by new accounts yesterday seem fairly strong evidence of socking.'' - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It's possible. The previous cases turned up a bunch of sleepers, so perhaps this will too. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hoo boy. Alright, these are all ✅:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then. All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

23 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Identical behaviour to other recent socks: Ref to fictitious company "Central European Waste Management" and creation of user & user talk pages with contemt "..." David Biddulph (talk) 09:52, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It's fairly possible; endorsing for confirmation and sleeper check. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Confirmation is hardly necessary as the behavioural evidence is conclusive. The only other unblocked account that I could find that was related is . I'm looking at the possibility of a rangeblock, but this case need not stay open while I do that. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 00:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. Both have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)