Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuntable/Archive

23 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious quacking. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I'm not overly familiar with the situation here, but taking a brief look into this, I would endorse checkuser involvement. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 04:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * In view of the IP's incivilness, personal attacks, and harassment, as well as the fact that only one article was edited by it that was also edited by Tuntable, it actually is quite unlike Tuntable's good-faith but misguided edits. Hence I no longer will defend my argument that these two are the same, and CheckUser can't do anything. This might be (unintentional) meatpuppetry, but it's clear now that it isn't really socking.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closed with no action in light of Jasper's comment above. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 05:28, 25 November 2012 (UTC)