Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TurtleMelody/Archive

18 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Compare and  Both users have a history of blanking "in popular culture" sections using the word "trivia" in the edit summary.

Also see: Sockpuppet investigations/SmashTheState/Archive for a possible previous sock, and see.

"In popular culture" content lists several examples of what we want to see in "In popular culture" sections. Look at the third example. Disruptive editing doesn't get much clearer than that. Guy Macon (talk) 03:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Looks pretty obvious to me. Just looking at the first page of contribs for both, the edit summaries are obviously coming from the same person. From the IP:, and . From the user: ,  and . The CU won't comment on IPs but it isn't really needed here; obvious duck.  Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 17:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  03:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * He has been there on a static IP for months so giving him 6 months for socking and block evasion. Closing.