Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Twillisjr/Archive

22 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Restoring one of Twillisjr's edits (lacking a secondary source) to Pyramid, accusing the editor of vandalism (despite the edit falling under WP:NOTVANDALISM), a rather common problem for Twillisjr (despite repeated explanations that he cannot call edits vandalism just because he disagrees with them). Ian.thomson (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll also note that both have accused me of Wikistalking for reverting them in the sort of articles I've been hanging around for years (see ), and has a problem with civility. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * And looking over both account's contributions, it appears this is not the first time he's switched to his IP to edit war and make personal attacks either 1 and 2. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

He hasn't reached 3rr on that page yet, but he has been edit warring in the past few days to add WP:UNDUE WP:Primary sourced WP:OR on other pages, generally being uncivil while doing so, despite repeated explanations on how to and requests to improve. I admit that this particular instance doesn't amount to abuse, but with his other edits this buckled the camel's knees. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't really see any abuse here; it's not against the rules to edit whilst logged out. There would be a case were Twillisjr editing logged out to avoid breaching 3RR, but this was the first revert, and it was 13 hours after the original logged-in edit. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 01:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm still not seeing anything in the contribs that would ammount to abuse of multiple accounts. The named account may well be acting disruptively in other ways, but in terms of SPI there's nothing else to be done here. Closing Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 12:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After multiple attempts by Twillisjr to add in material softening criticism in Steven Hassan (see Talk:Steven Hassan) Imagodoc does the same thing. See also the COI/PAID questions at User talk:Twillisjr(&supra) which were not well addressed. Jbh Talk  19:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Might be one of a drawer. Account was used for similar edits re cleaning up/polishing cult related bios . The account's contributions are quite short. Of note, even the edits to List of animals with fraudulent diplomas relate to Steve Eichel the subject of the prior diff. Jbh  Talk  01:43, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * A day after Imagodoc's edit is reverted, Twillisjr returns to try inserting the material again . Jbh  Talk  07:25, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2019 (UTC)