Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Twosided55/Archive

11 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See vote-stacking at Articles for deletion/Twelve Visions Party. Similar comment style, similar opinions, similar userpages, similar contributions. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅ as .--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Puppets already indef'd and I've tagged them. Master blocked for 3 days. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

24 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I don't believe this guy decided to listen to me last time when we marked his accounts as socks and blocked them. Not only has he taken up to socking, but after I locked down the main deletion discussion, we now see many sockpuppets on the talk page of the discussion. Given the editing style, it is highly unlikely this is anything but the same person. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Well, this is very sweet of you to open an investigation as to whether or not I am one human being with one Wikipedia account. The truth is... I am. Good luck with your investigation and please try not to waist too much of my time or anyone else who may be involved in this process. Thank you kindly for your deepest and most thoughtful considerations from the heart. Highest Regards 72.130.168.220 (talk) 04:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I am a real person with my own individual opinion. My deepest sympathy goes out to anyone who tries to deny others their individual rights to support or oppose the thoughts, opinions, and/or expressions of others. It is in my personal experience that collective ideas lead to successful solutions.Tina Levesque (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * That's quite possible as I know that there is off-Wiki campaigning to get people to come to the AfD. I'm sure there's a Neothink network doing this privately also. The only clear diff I can find involves two other accounts, who created User talk:Jigbuild. That's quite possibly a sockpuppet. We are dealing with an organisation that has been described as acting like a cult, so meat puppetry is to be expected. Dougweller (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - We need more diffs to justify a check... Rschen7754 04:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * - after several days with no response. Rschen7754 01:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm going to close this case. I think what we have is not sockpuppetry, but people recruited to an AfD in order to keep an article (an effort which failed, by the way). Most of the accounts listed above are throw-away accounts that were created for the AfD and are unlikely to be used again (and have not edited since). The only accounts that have been used outside of the AfD are JoshuaSeymour and Twosided55, and they seem to have no similarities at all aside from having both argued for keeping the article at the AfD. So I'm going to mark this for closure with no need for action. --  At am a  頭 22:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)