Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ucla90024/Archive

08 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Badge714 writes in the same manner and tone as Ucla90024, see compared with. He also reinstates or gives blanket support to Ucla90024's edits as seen here:,. Both accounts edit articles related to Los Angeles (both seem to especially like editing lists) and their edit times don't overlap, sometimes continuing to edit mere minutes after switching to the other account. …Grayshi talk ■ my contribs 21:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Will Beback is an established user and is the main person for using the photos, but adding captions. Ucla90024 and Beach714 are not really involved in the discussion so singling them out for checkuser snooping is not necessary. Grayshi should just discuss it more on the talk pages than running to the checkuser since Ucla90024 and Beach714 edits are immaterial to the talk page discussion. Username 823878701234 (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Disruptive single-purpose account much? Your first few edits are to sockpuppet investigation pages and your smirky comments (where you inappropriately make assumptions about my reasons for opening this SPI) do not help. I smell a sock. -Grayshi  talk/contribs 22:53, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Adding a CU onto this. There is a fair amount of overlap, but CU would help clarify. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ for User:Ucla90024 and User:Badge714. Also User:X69lee45 (already blocked). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shell Kinney (talk • contribs) 02:26, December 18, 2010
 * Blocked, closing. Nakon  03:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)