Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ujjwalanuragauthor/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
The commonality here is the determination to get a Wikipedia article on a non-notable individual Ujjwal Anurag in the main space (see Draft:Ujjwal Anurag for evidence of how many attempts and page moves are involved here). I didn't ask for CU because I'm sure that Ujjwalanuragauthor account is stale. The evidence can be seen in Deleted Contributions which will require admin-goggles. I've been watching the Move log which brought this article and editor to my attention. This might be tricky as Brandflock is the much older account. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
 * Thanks for your help. I missed that damning diff you shared. I guess it's clear that it is the article subject again. I've seen a bunch of these very determined editors creating accounts to push articles about themselves into main space. I mean, it happens all of the time but I've encountered it a lot this week. Happy holidays! Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * seems kind of damning. Izno (talk) 05:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * , indeed, Ujj is stale. Brandflock is a miss but does appear on typically spammy networks with a common UA. Going to have to be behavioral only. I'd personally block Brandflock for UPE, COI, or promo. Izno (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked Brandflock for spamming and likely socking/meatpuppetry. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)