Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ulita/Archive

18 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All the named accounts are single-purpose accounts that have only ever edited the Hannibal Reitano page, and/or contributed to the current AfD debate. None of the named accounts has created a user page. Another shared feature is that none of them ever give an edit summary. This is also true of the IP contributions. asnac (talk) 07:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I note that the 'page ratings' of the Hannibal Reitano article are absurd (100% average across the board, and over 80 ratings per category have been submitted. Such a number might be compared with the 11 or 12 ratings per category for Prince Charles, to take a random example). While this doesn't show sockpuppetry, this is a further indication of deliberate abuse of Wikipedia by someone with an interest in the article. asnac (talk) 12:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * A majority of the accounts and IPs listed here are stale. I've blocked 190.139.27.84 and 181.28.151.105 for a week each, and Charles5511 and RollsRoyce indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts. It's pretty clear all of these accounts are connected on some level, and they're abusing the system (pagerankings, e.g.). —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)