Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Undersucker/Archive

Report date May 18 2009, 21:17 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Rastrojo

Well, I suspect that Undersucker is using a sockpuppet. First of all, both of them where inactive from April to 17-18 May (and curiously, both of them reverted me in the article about Leonese language (Undersucker reverting my tags about facts) (Bilgelik, ~2 hours later). A curious investigation, I think. Regards, Rastrojo (talk) 21:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * While I can see where you are going with this, I am not sure there is enough solid evidence to support taking any type of administrative action here. I welcome comments from other clerks / admins on this though. Tiptoety  talk 21:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd be inclined to agree. Worth watching though. Both have a tendency to use edit summaries rarely, with similar capitalisation, and have edits to similar articles. That said, I don't think this is a straightforward case, and therefore I think it should be closed pending solid evidence. I'll keep an eye on some of the articles too. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 00:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with both of you. Worth watching, but not actionable at this time.  I am closing the case.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  00:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions