Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uniquark9/Archive

11 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

SPA that continues edit war off from another Editor Avono (talk) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Uniquark9 apparently used the suspected sock account to perform a total of six reversions of disputed content at Mongol Empire yesterday, despite repeated entreaties to discuss the issue. He also used the suspected sock to make comments in agreement in the discussion. And he removed a comment from the talk page raising suspicion of his sock puppetry. The sock account was created during the time frame of the dispute. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sparta300+1 uses a colocation webhost. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  00:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Tagged the puppet. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ as per . This was a WP:DUCK in the first place, and the colo edit simply solidified it for me. Cheers =) -- slakr \ talk / 01:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

28 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The user Uniquark9 was blocked last month for using a sock under very similar circumstances; he blanked his talk page to hide evidence of that. Then and now he engaged in lengthy edit wars, violating 3RR, this time at Genghis Khan (history). He then uses his sock in the discussion on the talk page to agree with himself (discussion, diff). The talk page for Ceithe has been used by Uniquark9 apparently to store notes (I cannot read the language used), but then was similarly blanked. Uniquark9 racked up six reversions on the Genghis Khan page in a matter of a few hours yesterday. He also calls other users vandals or trolls for making good faith edits (see in this discussion and at Mongol empire). He routinely removes sourced content and when challenged he claims the sources are made up or "not mainstream" (example, regarding Encyclopedia Britannica). Then he supplements his argument with the sock agreeing with him. In this case the sock uses the same "not mainstream" argument about the source he doesn't like. (The previous investigation was raised by, who has also asked Uniquark9 to cease his disruptive editing.) Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The evidence for Evecurid is not as clear. The account was opened yesterday during a dispute that Uniquark9 was engaged in, however, and it has only been used to agree with Uniquark9 on talk pages . Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 15:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Lol. I just asked user Ceithe to comment on the debate. I am pretty sure his ip is different than mine. As for Evecurd I don't know him. Stop accusing me. Admins can see users' ip addresses. So please check the ip addresses of them and resolve this accusation.19:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Uniquark9 (talk)


 * The claim that I am a sockpuppet of Uniquark9 is certainly not justified. I only agreed with Uniquark9's comment in that page because I thought he was right about that part. That does not mean he and I are the same person, or that I will agree with everything he or other people will ever say. --Evecurid (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

It is worth noting here, for future referemce, that User:Ceithe has now been blocked indefinitely as a sock account of User:Ancientsteppe, which has also been blocked indefinitely. This confirms suspicions raised here and in a related ANI that Uniquark9, Ceithe, and unknown others are all linked and repeatedly using sockpuppet accounts. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I also suspect that User:188.158.95.245 is a sockpuppet of this user - see history of List of Turkic dynasties and countries.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 16:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Add User:188.158.104.214 to that as well.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 18:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Lol. Is it sockputting if somebody edit without logging? Read before accusing people: Defending yourself against claims. And I am not User:188.158.104.214. Uniquark9 (talk) 19:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

This is my ip 66.65.0.132 (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

https://db-ip.com/all/188.158.104 this is from Iran. https://db-ip.com/66.65.0.132 is from the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniquark9 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't think Evecurid is a sock of Uniquark, if Ceithe is a sock of Uniquark, as Ceitha and Evecurid have disagreed - see Talk:Genghis Khan.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 01:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Perhaps we'll make more headway with a new CU than we did with the last one. Ceithe mainly leaves messages in Mongolian (according to Google anyway). Once, again according to Google, he spoke in Yoruba language. Also the account looks somewhat suspicious because Ceithe left a message on their Talk page as well and because the user says they are Mongolian. That's all I have to go on with that account, so it's up to the CU if they want to include it. The one thing that stands out above everything else is that the master is tremendously disruptive irrespective of socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Checkuser comments: All named accounts are ❌, and the IPs are not related to any of the named accounts.  Risker (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action taken. Mike V • Talk 05:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

26 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets



Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * (3) ❌ to
 * ✅ to, notes in Sockpuppet investigations/Uniquark9 of that would be appreciated.
 * I've added this SPI for the record per DQ's comments. It comes from Sockpuppet investigations/Tirgil34. It's in a closed status and can be archived.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)