Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Userwritertechblogger/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts noticeably show the only focusing and consistent activities at the same one article within literally hours in between only to add and defend the same parts of the same article. SwisterTwister  talk  05:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This is the user "lulainlife." I am in no way related to the other user, and am located in the United States. Please let me know how I can fully defend myself. I am happy to provide any necessary materials. Lulainlife (talk) 05:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lulainlife (talk • contribs) 05:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Furthermore, I have begun a new page draft as well, and would appreciate your insight into why I am being targeted in this issue. (The draft is unfortunately still a draft.)Lulainlife (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm not associated to the lulainlife account. Check the IPs for further evidence, and I was still in the midst of editing information for this article. I am looking at other wiki articles to understand why this one was targetted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Userwritertechblogger (talk • contribs) 16:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please take a look at the edits to the deleted page and block if you believe there is convincing evidence of socking. Thanks, GABgab 15:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * - Userwritertechblogger created the deleted version and it was then expanded somewhat by Lulainlife; the version recreated by Userwritertechblogger is similar but not identical to the previous version. Both accounts are brand new and neither has any other deleted edits (I can't locate the draft referred to above). Endorsing my own request for CheckUser to evaluate technical connections. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The accounts are technically ❌. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In that case, with respect to sockpuppetry no action is warranted. To the editors: if you are the subject of the articles you are writing about, I strongly advise you to read our plain and simple conflict of interest guide to keep yourselves out of trouble here. If you have been hired to write an article, you are required to disclose this fact, please see Paid-contribution disclosure. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)