Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Utkarshwarrior/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK at Rajneesh. ,, and. Denies socking at. Tgeorgescu (talk) 03:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Somewhere between /. Same ISP but different devices and separated by a large distance in the same country. Not impossible, but also on the lower end of the possible spectrum. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing any evidence of socking. Two account, both objected to use of the term "godman".  That's not much to go on.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Perhaps not WP:SOCK, but WP:MEAT is highly probable. WP:DUCK at Rajneesh, the same DUCK as previously, namely changing "godman" to "mystic" despite the reference. (12 December), (28 October),, and  (9 November). Also, the way they changed it to Mystic (India) is strikingly similar. It is manifest that all three accounts lack the WP:COMPETENCE of editing wikilinks, and they lack it in precisely the same way, namely Mystic (India) and Guru (India) are nonexistent articles (red links).

So:


 * they all changed it to Mystic (India) or mystic (India), which would be one and the same article if it would exist;
 * they all changed it to red links like Mystic (India) and/or guru (India).

Denies socking at, so leniency should be off the table as unrepentant. That was his/her reply after the offer of leniency was on the table at.

So, what's the probability that 3 WP:SPA accounts gather at the same article during 45 days, making the same edit and having the same mistake of creating red links? Tgeorgescu (talk) 08:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser is. Aside from using the same very common ISP and being from the same country, there is no obvious connection between these three accounts. Yunshui 雲 水 10:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This was previously reported on 9 November, which I closed as saying there was insufficient evidence. The evidence presented here is essentially the same, with the addition of a single new user who has made exactly one edit.  Every other edit from the other two users pre-dates the previous report.  Based on the "mobile edit" tags, this is somebody on a mobile device, but that describes most people in India.  My inclination is to close this one, also with no action, but I'll leave that call to somebody else.  -- RoySmith (talk) 02:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * What Roy said. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 11:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)