Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vandyrandy/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pro forma, per checkuser. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, for the record. The user has claimed to be both Incorrigible Troll and UnderArmourKid. Personally I'm not convinced, but the technical evidence suggests that they are almost certainly not UnderArmourKid. . -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious ducks, based on the contributions. It appears that Vandyrandy is also continuing his impersonation of some other LTAs. Requesting a Sleeper Check on his IP range(s). By the way, the rangeblock on 2600:1000:b100::/42 needs to be extended to 3-6 months, given the persistent history of abuse (including personal attacks and Neo-Nazi type vandalism), and due to the fact that this vandal resumed socking and vandalizing immediately after his earlier rangeblock expired.  Light and Dark2000  (talk) 02:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
These accounts were all CU-blocked. No need to do anything more. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 09:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious ducks. Due to the recent socking activity and trolling, I'm requesting a Sleeper Check on the named account and the IP range, and the indeffing of any other accounts not listed here (and any other accounts need to be Globally Locked by Stewards). Ideally, the IP Range would also get a multi-month rangeblock, but anything short of an "anon-only" Global Rangeblock would likely fail to be fully effective.  Light and Dark2000  (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Added some more socks, following some personal attacks. I suspect that he's using proxy IPs again at this point; if he is, those proxy IPs need to be Globally Rangeblocked for at least a year.  Light and Dark2000  (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All relevant accounts confirmed and already blocked. DerNazi is probably ❌. No comment on the IP addresses. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)