Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VeNeMousKAT/Archive

05 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Only contributions are to Requests for adminship/Mkativerata 2. Obviously someone with a grudge against the user. All five are already blocked, but CheckUser requested for sleepers. Shirt58 (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Was on the verge of requesting this myself earlier. Yunshui 雲 水 12:06, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are from each other:
 * And the following accounts are from each other:
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * And the following accounts are from each other:
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * However, these two groups are ❌. PhilKnight (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

I tagged the master. I'm not doing anything with the other group. We'd have to open another SPI with the correct master of that group, and it's not worth it unless there's more disruption. The RfA will end in a few days and it is also semi-protected, so I'm going to assume this unsavory episode is over.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)