Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VenusFeuerFalle/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Both of their edit interest (turkey, Islam, Abrahimic religion, religion, germany, Satanism, Occult, schools of theology) and edit style and pattern of speech are suspiciously same. They both hold the same strategies while editing a topic. And they often mutually answers in the diacussuions allowing eath other all the time. Example: Sexuality in Islam article edit and talk page edits. And they both supports the same biased partiality in their edits. See here and here, they have a huge plenty of interactions on the same topics since 2016 till now. Amyroper (talk) 07:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Curious how you, as a brand new user, know how to file a SPI.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 07:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I searched on google and found it. I edit for past months without log in. Amyroper (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

You say they have plenty of interactions on the same topics since 2016, but the account 'Uness232' was created in 2020? You also have not provided any diffs or any other type of evidence. – 2804:F14:80C6:A301:2155:6FF7:21E3:4759 (talk) 08:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * They both edited in same topics before after and this unlogged comment is also done by one of the socks I am sure. Amyroper (talk) 08:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Amyroper, just a FYI, it is usually very bad form to share the results of a WHOIS on an IP. I've thus removed your comment.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 09:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Insufficient evidence. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * For the record, I've blocked Amyroper. Going through a proxy to start an SPI without evidence is NOTHERE behaviour, even though I don't know who they are, I know they're someone. Courcelles (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)