Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Verginia's star/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Topic overlap
 * Battleground behavior explicitly noted in both block logs
 * Talk page editing behavior after indefinite blocks
 * Very similar complaint style including selfmade list syntax
 * These edit summaries compared to the content of :
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , talk page access revoked, closing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious puppet of, who was last week disrupting the pages Aromanians and Aromanian language as. The latter account was blocked at 01:50 in 11 April 2021, while Cosmicdust00 was created at 11:49 in 11 April 2021. One could suppose that this user woke up, saw the block and just made another account. They only did two edits but they were on the pages Legione-Romana edited in the most. Notice also the use of "!" in their messages and how they are disputing changes opposing Legione-Romana (why would a new account do this if they weren't a sockpuppet?). See also Sockpuppet investigations/Verginia's star/Archive. The histories of Aromanians and Aromanian language may also be useful to get context. might be interested in this report. Super  Ψ   Dro  09:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked as an obvious sock, of whomever. I'll set the investigation status to "checkuser requested" as someone might want to have a look to properly establish the connection and check for sleepers, but feel free to decline and close. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * They're on completely different ranges in different countries; . Closing SPI...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * - given the CU result, does your block still make sense? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the check and the ping - possibly, based on behavior; I wouldn't yet unblock without an appeal. The first thing done with the account was joining a heated previous conflict with messages referring to that conflict. If a credible explanation for that is provided, I wouldn't object to an unblock. Closing for now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the confirmation. I'll go ahead and archive this as-is. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)