Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Veryverser/Archive

25 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User was blocked for using talk pages as forums. The IPs follow the same pattern and IPs are signing with blocked user's username.

I realize that most of the IPs are stale but thought I should still report. Please let me know if there's something else I should've done here. Thank you CutOffTies (talk) 14:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * A few of these have edited recently, so I've blocked them. Nearly all the IPs geolocate to the same region, and I'm pretty sure they're the same. I don't know if this is the master, or if there's someone even further back, but relist as necessary. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

12 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

A very straightforward DUCK case, no CU requested or needed. This report is mostly in response to statement to "relist as necessary". All three IPs sign every post as "Veryverser", (duh), and what they do is troll article talk pages with jokey "non-questions", coupled with disruptive comments laced with gratuitous and assorted insults aimed at editors and groups of people, etc. The most recently active IP issued a relatively  after being called on their trolling. They are not here to build an encyclopedia. Doc  talk  06:18, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
They are clearly from Veryverser, but that entire range hasn't edited since this case was started, so there is no purpose in rangeblocking, not to mention there would be likely some collateral damage as a result. --MuZemike 20:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

30 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

He actually signs as that (indef blocked) user; behaviour pattern is identical (> 90 % nonsense on talk pages). Why is the IP not blocked yet? Nczempin (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The IP has been blocked as another obvious Veryverser account. I would recommend that a clerk note this and move it to Sockpuppet investigations/Veryverser/Archive. Doc   talk  21:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious sock is obvious. I've corrected the master, now closing. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  11:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

05 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 01:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This is not Veryverser, merely someone else using an IP that Veryverser used briefly in 2011. Veryverser is an IP-hopper that seldom returns to the same IP, and if they did the behavior would be the same: trolling comments proudly signed with his name. Doc  talk  02:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Hallelujah. As someone caught up in this wide net only now, I can attest to the same. I am not he/she, yet seem to be burdened with a dynamic Sprint IP address he/she once used. I hope to be cleared of this dubious supposed association. --184.207.3.25 (talk) 07:51, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The Privacy policy generally doesn't allow CheckUsers to publicly connect named users to IP addresses. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack (note the signature). Sum mer PhD v2.0 04:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked for 3 days. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)