Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VictoriaJusticeFan1/Archive

16 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Nearly identical user names, all refusing to use talk pages. Repeated removal of AfD notices on Victoria Justice related articles. IPs may or may not be involved for similar activity, however two are in Brazil, one is UK, one in France. SummerPhD (talk) 04:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This user seems just to be a young person who wants to help out, but doesn't understand policies. Attempts to contact through talk page are usually futile. Ignorance is not an excuse to REPEATEDLY make mistakes, yet I do believe all hope is not lost and I am trying to personally contact this user through her talk page to get this sorted out. Please give me some time to try to get through to her and explain this policy. I will update. MobileSnail 05:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've been planning to have a chat with this user too and offer some help and guidance, but I'm afraid I've been a bit too busy to get it together - it's bedtime again now, but I'll try my best to do it tomorrow. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and with ...12 blocked, at least I'll know which one to talk to now ;-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't think a CU is necessary here. I've blocked and tagged Fan12 and warned the master. The IPs are old enough that I think they're stale and aren't worth acting on. Relist if there are new developments. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

29 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Both edit extensively in Big Time Rush articles (the show, band and songs). Numerous near misses, zero overlaps:

3Feb 0:23 - 1:22 VJF 3Feb 1:34 - 1:40 IP

22Feb 1:36 - 1:41 VJF1 22Feb 1:59 IP 22Feb 17:58 - 18:16 VJF1 22Feb 18:36 - 18:36 IP 22Feb 18:41 VJF 22Feb 19:00 - 19:55

23Feb 0:37 - 0:37 IP 23Feb 1:15 - 1:44 VJF 23Feb 2:12 IP

24Feb 19:35 IP 24Feb 19:50 - 20:26

15March 19:27 - 20:04 VJF 15March 20:20 - 20:27 IP

While the IP is blocked, VJF is continuing to edit.

16March 19:21 - 19:37 VJF 16March 19:54 IP SummerPhD (talk) 03:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm endorsing to see if VictoriaJusticeFan1 == Treemanshoe (more specifically,, the latest known sock). It's the same content and we've seen this behavior before. I don't expect any comment on the IP. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:34, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Treemanshoe doesn't appear to be registered. . Can you check that, please? Courcelles 01:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Correction: . –MuZemike 01:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah. That'll teach me to use Special:ListUsers rather than the search bar. Courcelles 01:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

First off, User:TrEeMaNsHoE is.

Secondly, User:VictoriaJusticeFan1 and User:GlennMartinFan are very, bordering on ❌.

Finally, the following accounts are ✅ as each other:




 * all that needs to be done are to block and tag the confirmed socks.

Looking at editing behaviors and patterns, I would say those confirmed accounts are likely socks of TrEeMaNsHoE. –MuZemike 01:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I can't read. But I've blocked and tagged the socks listed above. Now to deal with the original case... —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comparing this IP to the ones that came up in the archive, they all geolocate to different places. Anyway, there isn't really any malicious editing per se, and there are some articles that have no overlap. I'm closing with no further action taken for now, but relist if things change. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:10, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

17 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack. SummerPhD (talk) 23:28, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Blocked and tagged the account, but looking for sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:32, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Nada. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)