Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Visioncoop/Archive

14 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Two editors whose sole purpose appears to be creating a vanity piece for a painter of dubious notability Porturology (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I have blocked the account indefinitely, as I noted that on the talk page of the Michael Gorman (artist) which was deleted, they commented "I am his representation", which when combined with their repeated re-creation of the article, shows that their purpose here is to promote him. I have no comment about the SPI itself. (Incidentally, I have indefinitely protected the article from recreation)  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 04:18, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm going to let this go with no further action taken. The user is now down to one unblocked account and the article has been salted, so there's not much more to do. But relist if more things happen. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 07:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)