Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vita2203/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Accounts all apparently interested in promoting Fiona Lazareff and/or her website divento.com, with extensive spamming of links to that site. Apart from the co-incidence of the three usernames containing Vita:


 * ZivaVita spams a link to divento.com; the reference is curiously formatted, with a link to another site also
 * Tracy-grt spams a link to divento.com; the reference is curiously formatted, with a link to another site also; another example here
 * BeatrijsEsther spams a link to divento.com; the reference is curiously formatted, with a link to another site also
 * Battersea Vita's first edit fiddles with a link to divento.com previously added by Tracy-grt; the reference is curiously formatted, with a link to another site also
 * 93.97.99.106 spams a link to divento.com.

Check-user requested for confirmation, and in case there are other accounts too. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is to, sharing a fairly busy IP range and a fairly common user agent. Remaining accounts are  and of course no comment on the IP address. As Battersea Vita isn't presently active, I think I'll say , as there isn't enough evidence for a CU block. No sleeper accounts were visible on the ranges used by the accounts that were checked. ST47 (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged all the named accounts. Blocking the IP seems kind of pointless given the passage of time.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)