Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vitamindaughter/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Earlier Vitamindaughter was blocked indefinitely, now Hot tin roof shows up and in the first edit restores their content. You'd have to very gullible not to suspect block evasion. Kleuske (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Kleuske (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account now blocked. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 19:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pushing the same POV on the same article Exemplo347 (talk) 23:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * See also this facepalm-inducing personal attack here at this very page. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

If you guys leave me alone and Kleuske stops choosing to interact with me you will see I do nothing wrong I think you should try waiting and seeing how it goes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writtenheard (talk • contribs) 02:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This weird obsession with Kleuske is evidence enough. Exemplo347 (talk) 07:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey @Exemplo347 Actually I don't have interest in that person Kleuske they are just the only person flagging me for removal or flagging my posts for removal when I'm talking to other users constructively about improving phrasing like taking out page numbers or info about number of weeks of a clerkship or signing my posts properly. If this person would not interact with me to try to remove my voice or my account there would be no issue bc I am making contributions and enjoy working w all other users. Thanks.Writtenheard (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * That looks like a pretty open admission of sockpuppetry and block evasion to me. See also Chutzpah. Kleuske (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

I hate to break it to you but, in this case, it's ME who has reported you for abusing multiple accounts. The correct thing to do, if you want to continue editing, is to follow the instructions on the talk page of your original account. Until then, nobody will work with you. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * @Exemplo347 yo I can see on this page who flagged hot tin roof either way it doesn't matter I don't need to work on anything today or tomorrow I'm pretty busy I can wait a few weeks. Obviously in the comment above she's pushing for my banning and using my family's native language idk why but it doesn't make me feel wonderful but it's fine if she talks to me again I'll just ignore it. Writtenheard (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Well you won't be working on anything on Wikipedia until you get your main account unblocked (have you followed the instructions?). For the record, it was me who applied for page protection for the article you were editing, and it was me who did the same for the Talk page of the article. If you're "pretty busy" then that's fine - you won't have Wikipedia to distract you. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * @Exemplo347 it doesn't matter who took the actual action I can see the discussion about the situation on the main I can see who reverted the edits initially I don't like having my words in quotes I'm extremely busy I'm a graduate student and these are my last two weeks of school. You didn't listen to what I said at all which was that or maleroosters or whatever summary of the first line of one of the articles didnt reflect the reason probation was initiated. Page protection was unnecessary bc I didn't make edits to the page but was talking to you about it on the talk page. I'm really tired of being treated unfairly and I don't care enough to follow instructions about getting things unblocked. Writtenheard (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writtenheard (talk • contribs) 20:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . GABgab 02:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * --Neil N  talk to me 21:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC)