Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vj rom/Archive

13 February 2016
Suspicious edits on Jonalyn Viray, possible WP:COI. --Laber□T 16:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * Of User:Vjrome03. Laber□T 20:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - You suspect  is a sockpuppet of whom?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - see vs/ .  Vanjagenije   (talk)  21:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Is it possible that the Vjrome03 account was created because Vj rom forgot they had their original account (which hadn't been used since 2009)? I'm just concerned it's a misunderstanding as opposed to outright socking.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't worry. --Laber□T 22:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't prove anything, those edits were all made after Vjrome03 edited. It really does look like Vj rom just forgot they had an account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * It seems the user knew of his account at least for a few years, since he blanked the talk page from time to time without logging in. --Laber□T 23:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm closing this case with no action taken. I agree with Ponyo that this might be a bit of a misunderstanding and there doesn't appear to be malicious intent here. Plus, the accounts haven't made any edits since. If an issue arises, we can look at the case again. Mike V • Talk 03:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)