Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vost/Archive

04 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Accreditor picked up where blocked User:ElliotJoyce left off, reverting the same edits and referring to other editors as black supremacists. See and  as examples. Quack. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I just added an IP, 66.91.245.60, that has been undoing other editors' reverts of ElliotJoyce's edits. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * With this edit, User:Accreditor acknowledges that he is the IP. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, I edited that page because I tracked it through your contributions history. Please desist in Wikihounding my edits- I am not a sockpuppet for anyone. Accreditor (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Pretty quacky indeed. I've blocked Accreditor as a suspected sock (not checked) and blocked the IP for 2 weeks. Elockid  ( Talk ) 03:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * All named accounts share a similar POV and a similar method of pushing said POV. By "similar", I mean that they are quacking loudly and that the Accreditor account, the only one not already blocked, needs to be indeffed and the IP needs... I donno... 72 hours? Yeah, let's go with 72. If a passing admin would be so kind...  S ven M anguard   Wha?  03:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)