Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WCGSOldBoy/Archive

15 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Requesting a checkuser to investigate any potential range blocks due to the persistence of the vandal.

The sockpuppetry is clear with a simple WP:DUCK test by looking at the page contributions (primarilly at User talk:Acroterion and Wallington County Grammar School) - Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Funny you should bring this up... I've been placing rangeblocks since Acroterion brought this to my attention. I've tried to keep them short, but I'm slowly increasing the duration as the user persists. If more activity occurs, please let me know. (For the record, the above accounts are all ✅ matches to each other.) TN X Man  20:52, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * They're all blocked, and I've updated the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

22 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Barek as an obvious sock.) 
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Materialscientist as an obvious sock.) 
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Bongwarrior as an obvious sock.) 
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Barek as an obvious sock.) 
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Materialscientist as an obvious sock.) 
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Bongwarrior as an obvious sock.) 
 *  (Note:BLOCKED by Bongwarrior as an obvious sock.) 


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Request to check for sleepers and block accordingly, thank you. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 22:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I've also just blocked another account: It's another obvious sockpuppet. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This guy was trolling my talk page, Favonian's, and Acroterion's earlier. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure if this is going to be helpful, but . -- Σ talkcontribs 05:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * BLOCKED, TAGGED and ARCHIVED → WP:Sockpuppet investigations/WCGSOldBoy/Archive. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 06:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * BLOCKED, TAGGED and ARCHIVED → WP:Sockpuppet investigations/WCGSOldBoy/Archive. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 06:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I assume the checkuser is for sleepers, so.. yeah, let's see. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'll also ask for an IP block here, given their repeated socking. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * An IP block isn't very feasible, unfortunately. They're bouncing around a pretty big range(s). I've been doing a little bit here and there, but there would be a lot of collateral to completely stop this. No sleepers that I saw either. TN X Man  13:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Blah, alright. I've updated the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

31 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Request to check for sleepers and block accordingly. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 15:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Comment: sleepers are unlikely, they use dynamic IPs, so can create new accounts as needed. Periodic range blocks might slow their activity - otherwise; just use revert, block, & ignore. Typical troll behavior on their part, nothing special here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm afraid I see you reason to check this. All the above listed accounts are indef blocked and as pointed out by Barek there is nothing new or special here - just deny recognition and WP:RBI-- Cailil  talk 17:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * - That may be, but I'll still endorse to have the checkusers take a look at this to see if _anything_ can be done. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * There's no common range, sorry. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:12, 3 August 2011 (UTC)