Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WP.Raj Sharma/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
SPAs indulging in self promotion & promotion of Raj Sharma's business interests.
 * Draft:All India Council For Robotics & Automation
 * User:All India Council for Robotics & Automation (AICRA)
 * User:AICRA Delhi
 * FutureTech Media
 * Draft:FutureTech Media
 * Technoxian
 * Draft:India STEM Mission
 * Rajkumar Sharma (technocrat)
 * AICRA
 * Draft:AICRA certifies programs of National Institute of Robotics & Artificial Intelligence (NIRA)
 * Global Artificial Intelligence Summit & Awards
 * Draft:Raj kumar Sharma
 * Special:Diff/1024334197

Most of the accounts have been soft blocked but, had their link to the master been known would have been hard blocked. The earliest hardblock on enwiki is for, and All India Council for Robotics & Automation (AICRA) on mediawiki on 8 Oct 2020. Cabayi (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * +User:2022 AICRA (see deleted userpage). Cabayi (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * User's response, copied from their talk page,
 * Opening account 4years back and not being active doesnt mean that it would happen in future. thats why I've contributed in past few months. 2nd, what makes you realize that I'm promoting myself and my enterprises? I'm an individual and have expertise in technology sector. I can share what Information I have and what goes around me. I clearly stated earlier that I opened account with the same as I didnt know much about it. WP.Raj Sharma (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * - Cabayi (talk) 09:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - there are several non-stale accounts. Considering the prolific socking, I think this is worth a check for sleepers. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * . --Blablubbs (talk) 20:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The data here is not fun to work with, but these two are ✅ to :
 * This one is ✅ to :
 * There are a few more potential sleepers that I'm not comfortable blocking, but will keep an eye on. Translating the web of technical relationships here into templatespeak would be a little time-consuming and I'm not sure it's worth it since they're mostly already blocked – if that sounds good to you,, I'd suggest just (re-)blocking everyone who needs it, tagging as proven, and calling it a day. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * sounds fine to me. :) Spicy (talk) 20:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, should be all done, closing. I left the unblocked stale accounts alone, let me know if you want me to block those as well. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There are a few more potential sleepers that I'm not comfortable blocking, but will keep an eye on. Translating the web of technical relationships here into templatespeak would be a little time-consuming and I'm not sure it's worth it since they're mostly already blocked – if that sounds good to you,, I'd suggest just (re-)blocking everyone who needs it, tagging as proven, and calling it a day. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * sounds fine to me. :) Spicy (talk) 20:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, should be all done, closing. I left the unblocked stale accounts alone, let me know if you want me to block those as well. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)