Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WWEJobber/Archive

21 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Nomelck was created the day after (9/16) User:WWEJobber was blocked. Their viewpoints on talk pages are very similar, as is their use of syntax in English on certain pages, namely List of WWE personnel. Kjscotte34 (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Alright, I'm going to do this in chronological order. Background info - Before September 2012, WWEJobber blocked twice in March 2011 for edit warring, once in March 2012 for disruptive page-move warring. Fast forward to September 2012. Conflict on List of WWE personnel between WWEJobber, Vjmlhds and Keith Okamoto starts around 10 September to 17 September on the article and also at Talk:List of WWE personnel/Archive 17, Talk:List of WWE personnel/Archive 17.

15 September, WWEJobber Timelog: edits on 02:28, 02:28, 02:39, 03:59, 04:01, 04:31. Nomelck's (could I check when Nomelck was created) first edits: 15 September 02:38, (11 edits in between 02:39 to 03:46), 03:46. Right "between" WWEJobber's editing range when he was "silent" from 02:39 to 03:59. Out of all these edits, WWEJobber and Nomelck both vote "Agree" on a merge discussion regarding Vince McMahon. 17:05-18:02, WWEJobber makes several edits to WWE articles. 20:43, WWEJobber edits with the summary "Shares of a company are not ownership stake. You can discuss everything that you want with me, but not this, 'coz I have a bachelor's degree in Management. Stay in you place." 20:48-20:52, Nomelck makes some very, very minor edits to Igarassu. 20:49-21:18, WWEJobber is editing WWE articles again. 21:27, in the last edit before being blocked on 15 September, WWEJobber removes talk page information on NiciVampireHeart reporting him for edit warring, removes small conflict with MrMoustacheMM, removes notice of block by HJ Mitchell for extremely disruptive combative page-move warring. Also barely two days earlier on September 13, WWEJobber removed an edit warring warning from Dcheagle.

15 September 21:32, WWEJobber blocked for edit warring after being reported by Keith Okamoto. At 21:49, Nomelck, back online again and not even a day-old account, reports Vjmlhds (as said above, in conflict with WWEJobber) for edit warring and 3RR. Nomelck later claimed it was unfair WWEJobber was blocked but not Vjmlhds. After 15 September, Nomelck goes silent, until...

19 November. WWEJobber has returned for some time, and WWEJobber and myself are arguing on different sides at Talk:NXT Wrestling. I make the comment at 19 November 10:52: "We clearly need people to take sides here (KO and Srsrox?). I'm going to PM people from the WP:PW project to get them to choose." WWEJobber responds on 19 November 16:14. On 20 November 2012, 02:46, Nomelck posts on the talk page, agreeing with WWEJobber. WWEJobber's last edit was minutes earlier at 20 November 02:02.

Also on 19 November, WWEJobber and Vjmlhds edit on whether to name Vince McMahon with the middle name 'K.' or not. Vjmlhds removes the K. Next edit, WWEJobber adds the K. 20 November 03:37, Nomelck comments at Talk:List of WWE personnel, supporting the addition of the "K." which was WWEJobber's position. WWEJobber commented on that same "thread" at 20 November 01:49. At 20 November 04:01, WWEJobber starts editing again.

13 December 02:11 Nomelck makes its final edit so far, agreeing with WWEJobber yet again in a discussion... "The guy could be a pain, but he is right in this case..." WWEJobber's last edit before Nomelck's was at 22:18 12 December.

In conclusion, just by looking at Nomelck's contributions, I cannot see how a person would edit on three separate days within the last four months, and on every single day he edits he agrees with WWEJobber on a professional wrestling talk page, yet this person has never even edited a single professional wrestling page but only talk pages. Suspicious, is it not? That's what I have for now. Starship.paint (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
--(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 03:38, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

The two of them appear ❌. Despite that, I find it a bit of a coincidence that two the of them are both from the same country (Brazil) and have the same ISP. The population of Brazil is quite large however, so that means very little. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 17:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on the lack of checkuser correlation, I'm not going to block. But this does look very suspicious. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)