Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waenceslaus/Archive

24 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All of these are WP:SPA bent on protecting article Anna Eliza Williams. They are !voting Keep in this discussion about it:Articles for deletion/Anna Eliza Williams. If these are not sockpuppets, they are at least meat puppets. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * This is the most ridiculous crap I have ever heard. Just because someone votes "Keep" in an AfD doesn't mean that they are a sockpuppet. Why not nominate the people who voted "Delete" as well? How can you be sure that they aren't sockpuppets? I am myself and almost every single account you can find on the internet with the username "930310" is associated to me, not someone else. 930310 (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I suggest that this SPI should be renamed to "Waenceslaus". 930310 (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Can you not run an IP check on these accounts? Do so and you will find that none of them are the same people as me. The nominator's evidence is very weak indeed - users who share the same opinion must be meatpuppets? Seriously? I've been on Wikipedia for nearly two years and have over 2000 edits, so I don't see how I can be described as a meatpuppet. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As an admin who's probably involved here, I'd say it's a bit weak to use a single AFD discussion as evidence. There's probably two dozen or so discussions found at WikiProject World's Oldest People/Article alerts that have similar patterns with possibly the same individuals. Note though that ARBCOM discretionary sanctions are available for any uninvolved admin which may be a better method of dealing with the more aggressive editors. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * All of the named account are ❌ to each other.
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Waenceslaus was indefinitely topic-banned on August 16, 2015. White Eaglet was created a short time later to circumvent the topic ban. I have blocked and tagged both accounts indefinitely. The only reason I'm not closing this SPI is if a clerk wants to create a new SPI with Waenceslaus as the master or move this one to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll support movement to Waenceslaus. There's no reason to name this after someone who has no involvement in the issue. I think I'm probably too involved ot do it myself. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Waenceslaus was indefinitely topic-banned on August 16, 2015. White Eaglet was created a short time later to circumvent the topic ban. I have blocked and tagged both accounts indefinitely. The only reason I'm not closing this SPI is if a clerk wants to create a new SPI with Waenceslaus as the master or move this one to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll support movement to Waenceslaus. There's no reason to name this after someone who has no involvement in the issue. I think I'm probably too involved ot do it myself. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)