Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Walrus Ji/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Walrus Ji and ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା have edit warred to remove same sections on Mamta Banerjee, and are only users to do so.

Tag teaming on Dilip Ghosh (politician) by targeting Manasbose.


 * "Wikipedia is not a democracy" (Walrus Ji)
 * "Wikipedia is not an electronic vote machine" (ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା)

Walrus Ji talked about reporting Manasbose and ତୁମ୍ଭର_ପିତା_ଓ_ରାଜା did it today. Azuredivay (talk) 11:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks . It seems that ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା was still created before എപ്പോഴും രാജാവ് and both accounts are used for feuding with different people in violation of WP:SCRUTINY. Behavioral evidence shows strong connection with Walrus Ji and I too think that possible connection between the two cannot be ruled out. Azuredivay (talk) 03:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Which person makes their first edit to SPI? ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା was created before എപ്പോഴും രാജാവ്. It does not seem to be a case of forgetting password but evasion of scrutiny. Azuredivay (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

For the administrator and Checkuser: Only commenting to request the admin to look at the links more clearly because Azurdivay has made misleading statements here. Please check the full edit history of Dilip Ghosh (politician) and Mamta Banerjee and talk sections of the articles instead of only the links given by Azuredivay. Me and Walrus ji had dispute with Manabose earlier and we are not connected in anyway.

User:Walrus Ji has given the policy "Wikipedia is not a democracy"., not commented. I wrote "Wikipedia is not an electronic vote machine to easily exploit"(Azuredivay has deliberately shown half the sentence to match with walrus Ji) because BJP(a political party) is accused of tampering with vote machines (I apologize for this). Walrus ji talks about reporting Manasbose for "edit-war" while I reported Manasbose in Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. If you read the report Manasbose had stuffed Mamata Bannerjee with criticism and removed anything negative from her political opponent Dilip Ghosh which led the way to a content dispute with Manasbose. In my opinion this report must have disturbed Azuredivay. You can checkuser me if you are still not satisfied. ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Walrus Ji and ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା are users in the same country within which geolocation is unreliable and on separate ISPs. This normally comes out to, maybe.
 * ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା is, however, to, which if you look at the edits merits further investigation. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 21:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Just an ex SPI clerk stumbling in here, but I don't see a clear cut link to Walrus Ji in the behavior, and while CU may show a potential technical link between ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା and എപ്പോഴും രാജാവ്, I don't see evidence of abuse (overlap/tagteam/etc), so I don't see a reason to take action. It might be the same person, but one stopped before the other started, so it could be as simple as a forgotten password. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 23:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * CheckUser evidence conclusively indicates that എപ്പോഴും രാജാവ് did not lose their password. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 20:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess someone is waiting for me to comment, although I don't really have anything to say. I don't see any crossover in their edits, no recent abuse, no "abuse" or rationale to sanction.  Others can take action if they see it differently.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 22:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, there's not much to investigate when it comes to എപ്പോഴും_രാജാവ്, given they've hardly edited at all. Both accounts do seem suspicious, but എപ്പോഴും_രാജാവ്'s main contribution was to file an unrelated SPI involving different editors and articles. If they return to editing or new evidence arises, a new SPI may be started, but as of now, I'll be closing this case with no action. Sro23 (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)