Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Weather190/Archive

08 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Deleted user contributions all show draft weather-related articles on each user page (deleted by user request, not because there was anything wrong with the content). Passes WP:DUCK test. The accounts seem benign, not being used for nefarious reasons, so I saw no real reason to block any of them just yet. The contribution history of each suggests that accounts are created, used to create a draft, and then abandoned. On the other hand, I don't see any reason why this user can't stick to one account. Asking for checkuser to determine any sleepers and perhaps warn the original. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC) ~Amatulić (talk) 19:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given that there is no abuse, I don't see what a sleeper check will accomplish. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If there's no abuse then CU is not warrented here, and neither is anything else except a warning, which a CU isn't necessary for. Rschen7754 08:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All accounts warned, no further action required at this time. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)