Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WebsterThailand/Archive

22 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

After first handle was banned for 5 years of vandalism, 2 more "marketing" handles were immediately registered and began posting the same marketing spam to Webster University Thailand Faoner (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

When reporting an SPI investigation, it is usually best to replace the content of the userpages of the sockmaster and socks with transclusions of Template:Sockpuppeteer, Template:Sockpuppet (for registered user socks, remember to supply the sockmaster as a parameter), and Template:IPsock (for IP user socks; again, remember to supply the sockmaster as a parameter). This will populate a category (list of pages) containing suspected socks of the sockmaster. Gparyani (talk) 17:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Sayoon3. For the moment I've blocked Faoner (the filer here and puppet in the other SPI) and Poinsot9 for 72 hours for violating WP:3RR at the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

. I'm endorsing a CU between Poinsot9 and the master only. No evidence has been presented for Inkyhack, and the one sentence by the filer is incorrect as to Inkyhack. The master was blocked on February 5, 2015, and Inkyhack's account was created in 2010, although they didn't edit anything until a year later.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Poinsot9 is a ✅ sock of WebsterThailand. Elockid  ( Talk ) 20:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Poinsot9 indeffed and tagged. Master tagged. No other action. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

08 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Please review the behavior of jake9977 and compare it to, it is identical in form, repeatedly reverting articles claiming vandalism of any form of criticism of the administration of Webster University Thailand while making no real contributions, in essence trying to silence any spotlight on this problem which has even been acknowledged by Webster University itself in an internal memo and by the Bangkok post.

in addition the account only became active in the last few days and proceeded only to behave in this manner.

i tried to do what i could to link outside sources, everything can be independently verified. this person is behaving as a sock puppet, please dont allow this intolerance.

thank you. Kasikb (talk) 09:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't see any evidence to connect Jake9977 to the master. Their edits are not "identical in form" at all. I'm closing this as there is not enough evidence.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)