Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Weehh/Archive

Evidence submitted by Wtmitchell

 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=361006300&oldid=360860173
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=357951921&oldid=357951140
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=357768067&oldid=357757037
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=357757037&oldid=357614444
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=357357219&oldid=357135864
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=357132545&oldid=356483177
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boracay&action=historysubmit&diff=356333147&oldid=356321841

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

See also

the edits are very similar, possibly marking this out as a duck, furthermore checkusers generally are not at liberty to link users to IPs, per the checkuser policy. IP range appears to be. looks like they might be related as well. Of course, this could be meatpuppetry, although I'll leave it to an admin to decide that, I will note that WP:SHARE may be relevant. Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC) 122.55.48.0/20 blocked 1 month, and Weehh's block reset for evasion. –MuZemike 19:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)