Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Weissman129/Archive

Evidence submitted by SluggoOne
Those two IP users have repeatedly inserted somewhat partisan commentary (with malformed references) against consensus at Mike Arcuri. 67.249.50.152 has advised he is asking for the page to be protected and implied I am a vandal. I pointed out that, should the page be protected, 67.249.50.152 would not be able to edit it because he is not using an established account. In a surprising twist, Weissman129, who last was active a year and a half ago, emerged from the ether to make the same edits as the IPs with similar edit summaries and similar behavior at AIV. Weissman129 is showing quite a bit of knowledge of policies and WP locations for someone who hasn't been here in a year plus and doesn't seem to know how to reference external sources correctly. Şłџğģő 15:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Şłџğģő  15:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

,, no CU necessary. Tim Song (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Weissman129 as well as 67.249.48.0/22 blocked 1 week for sock puppetry. –MuZemike 20:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)