Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/What am you are 2/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

What am you are 8 was created solely to promote What am you are 7's GAN,. The GAN was passed without any actual reviewing, and an absurd rationale of "this page is a very good article, containing a good amount of reliable and notable info about the film. Better than some pages that are actually good articles". Perhaps the most obvious use of sockpuppets I've ever seen. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

, based off of the above. I think a checkuser might be wise; I have seen cases wrote when a malicious user decides to feign being a sock of another user. I don’t strongly suspect that to be the case here, but given how obvious the apparent socking is it might be worth a check. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

There's also who is likely the same person. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)


 * There's also, which based on the username and creation date is probably the first account. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * FWIW, that account is indeed stale. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I've blocked the two accounts without tags. There are a bunch more of What am you are # accounts, including one that is earlier than 7 but not stale and another one that is earlier but is stale. I am therefore requesting CU to sort this out and also look for accounts without the same naming simiilarity. Meanwhile, I'll add the accounts to the suspected list. Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 22:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ all around.  -- RoySmith (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, and yeah, I didn't find any sleepers. BTW, I've got a GAN pending; can I get this guy to review it for me? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I assume you are not confirming 2 and 3 (stale), right?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, technically, 3 is confirmed on CU data and 2 is confirmed on "by the time I've confirmed all the others, I can't see any possible way the last one isn't too". -- RoySmith (talk) 23:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - Please move to What am you are 2, and block and tag. Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I was originally planning to go with a talk first approach to see if that would yield anything useful before checking, but this works too. everyone but , closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 14:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)