Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WhitFruit/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

I'm convinced this is a thinly veiled block evasion by : exact same MO, with the same edits concerning categories going against consensus. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Moved case to correct master. Spicy (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * - username and edits make this incredibly obvious . Please indef Teader2 as a suspected sockpuppet of WhitFruit. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Salvio 21:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Another sockpuppet/block evasion by. I ran into them as, which let to and. This is getting tiresome. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 17:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to the previous batch, .  Salvio 18:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Hi everyone, WhitFruit/Teader seems to be back: Special:Contributions/201.189.69.163. Exact same one goal: removing categories, against consensus.

I'm on my phone, at this very moment giving my three month old a bottle. Copying diffs is not easy to do. If you need more evidence, I'll try reply in a couple of hours. Thanks. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is a duck, but hasn't edited since yesterday, so I'm inclined to consider it stale. I'll keep an eye on the IP, though. Closing. Salvio giuliano 08:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)