Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whiteproperton97/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * renamed to...
 * renamed to...
 * renamed to...
 * renamed to...
 * renamed to...


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This report has been made on my talk page, probably due to my WP:GS/PAGEANT protection of the Francisca James article. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Please BLOCK this users, both of these users account is doing the same vandalism edit thing Stopcyberbullyingindo#1#2#3, User:Willykelly#4#5, User:Longround120#6#7, Adachiii#8, Lara Hatsumi#9#10 & Jonasrivaldoakaronaldowati#11#12 (There's a lot of same edits behaviour proof as they did and they're appear together). They're vandalizing Francisca James page, they seems very suspicious with their edit (same edits by a newly-fresh created accounts), suspected as an sockedpuppet users, their edits are not based on the current legitimate references. These all users having the same edits and all user accounts was made by Abdiurangsunda as suspected before for vandalizing without sources and having multiple accounts that does the same edit behaviour. It's all started by Abdiurangsunda by creating multiple accounts from Jonasrivaldoakaronaldowati at first and now already spotted red handed by creating multiple accounts for the sake of vandalism without reference and now creating Stopcyberbullyingindo, User:Longround120, User:Willykelly, Adachiii, Lara Hatsumi & so on. Please be blocked all of them ASAP. 36.85.1.184 (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * @36.85.1.184, until we see all things you say are proved, they can't be blocked. will block them when he will verify these account's editing pattern are same according to your information. So be patient on this. Thanking you. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 06:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * @🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳  Here's the proof (click the linked hashtag numbers to see)>>> Stopcyberbullyingindo#1#2#3, User:Willykelly#4#5, User:Longround120#6#7, Adachiii#8, Lara Hatsumi#9#10 & Jonasrivaldoakaronaldowati#11#12 (and many more proofs on Francisca James: Revision history), their edit is all similar and all users is newly fresh while editing Francisca James page. Confirmed it's legit sockedpuppet. It's all started by Abdiurangsunda by creating multiple accounts from Jonasrivaldoakaronaldowati at first and now already spotted red handed by creating multiple accounts for the sake of vandalism without reference and now creating Stopcyberbullyingindo, User:Longround120, User:Willykelly, Adachiii, Lara Hatsumi & so on. 36.85.1.184 (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * If these are sockpuppets and blocked, please ping me afterwards; I'll add EC protection to the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Why am I involved in this? I recommend you to use CheckUser before performing blocks. Same editing patterns can happen coincidentally. Again, I recommend you to use a CheckUser to prove you that I am not involved in this. ~ Adachiii
 * Are you sure our edits are not based on real and legit references? Do you really know who is Francisca Luhong James? We are Malaysian. We know who is Francisca Luhong James very well. There are so many interviews about her here in Malaysia. Please check it out before stated here that we edit the page without real references. Why would you do this to Malaysian beauty queen? Is it because you guys feel insecure about her look and her progression for the upcoming Miss Universe 2020? and plus, Perek is NOT her name, and she is NOT Chinese. She already stated in her Instagram story that she is not Chinese. Where do you get this information? Where? Where are the proof?? ~ Lara Hatsumi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lara Hatsumi (talk • contribs) 07:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Requesting CU. This is probably a major meatpuppetry case, but let's see if there is any technical connection between all of these people. My feeling is that Lara Hatsumi and Lukewin aren't related.  Mario Jump  83!  12:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I have requested global locks.  Mario Jump  83!  00:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Adachiii renamed to Lukewin - updating accordingly. Cabayi (talk) 22:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * Also found and :
 * ❌ as far as technical evidence goes:
 * Bagging and tagging all confirmed socks found. This SPI should be renamed to the correct master, - a confirmed sock of this user.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   20:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and :
 * ❌ as far as technical evidence goes:
 * Bagging and tagging all confirmed socks found. This SPI should be renamed to the correct master, - a confirmed sock of this user.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   20:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and :
 * ❌ as far as technical evidence goes:
 * Bagging and tagging all confirmed socks found. This SPI should be renamed to the correct master, - a confirmed sock of this user.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   20:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all confirmed socks found. This SPI should be renamed to the correct master, - a confirmed sock of this user.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   20:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all confirmed socks found. This SPI should be renamed to the correct master, - a confirmed sock of this user.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   20:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:09, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Clear duck, going through states as before and restoring edits made by. CMD (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC) CMD (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Another in the same range. CMD (talk) 15:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * , CopyChoco's been confirmed as a sock of another sockmaster. You may want to file a report there. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Now moved. CMD (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The disruption has since stopped. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The user is now restoring and furthering previous Malaysian state infobox obsession with a rapidly changing IP (doubt this list is comprehensive), although they appear to be within a small range, so a range block may be possible. CMD (talk) 10:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * eg. :, IP: . CMD (talk) 01:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

The latest one is from a new IP range. CMD (talk) 09:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This has been open a few weeks now, disruption is continuing, and the diffs are quite literally a previous sock's edits before they were blocked. Oshwah, you blocked Copychoco on 3 January, can you either range or semi? CMD (talk) 09:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oshwah, I provided an example diff from Copychoco and from an IP in response to the request for further information. Pretty much the only thing these IPs do is restore those particular edits from Copychoco. I can't see how I can give more than what is basically the entirety of their edits. The first IP on this list, 116.206.15.16, started literally the day after Copychoco was blocked. CMD (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , If you could come up with a list of the most frequently abusted article titles, I'll take a look at semi-protection for them. Spot-blocking of these IPs would be far too much whack-a-mole, and the required range (116.206/16) is too big to consider blocking. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi RoySmith, the above basically targeted the Category:States of Malaysia. The one week IP block created by Oshwah has worked for the moment. I don't know enough to judge if it is less disruptive to semi those 13 articles compared to maintaining Oshwah's block. (The original sock target article, Francisca James, is under ECP already.) CMD (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Semi-protecting those articles seems like the next reasonable step, but let's see what happens after the IP block expires.  If problems start up again, please ping me.  I'll close this for now. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  01:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Chipmunkdavis - I've blocked the 116.206.14.0/23 range for one week for disruptive editing. We'll still need evidence and diffs that this is, in fact, Whiteproperton97. See Vanjagenije comment above.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)