Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki-11233/Archive

Report date June 28 2009, 14:28 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Kww

Wiki-11233 gets into conflicts with me because of his insistence on adding charts that are either unsourced or are listed on WP:BADCHARTS. When I revert his edits, 83.109.100.230 comes to the rescue. Another example here.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * And again:. Evading final vandalism warning.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions


 * Unlikely that two different users would be both interested in the exact same stat table. Both have received 48 hour blocks. ~ fl 09:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 5 2009, 17:16 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

83.109.101.16 continues to insert the false information that 83.109.100.230 was blocked for. Obvious extension of the range. WHOIS shows it all as a part of a bit /16 range. Checkuser might be able to identify a smaller range that can be blocked effectively. At the very least, Wiki-11233 needs his block extended.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Kww
 * Added 88.91.12.183, as it has taken up the cause, and is also in Norway.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * has begun restoring edits previously reverted as block evasion, as in this one.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 17:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * - Tiptoety  talk 20:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

, bordering on ✅. The two accounts haven't used those specific IPs, but have used ones in the same region, city, ISP, etc, so it seems rather clear to me. Wizardman 17:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

IPs blocked for a week. Sock blocked/tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 19:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 14 2009, 13:33 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

IP address was previously confirmed by checkuser. After block expired, began evading block on named account, editing same articles with same edits. Block needs extending.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Evidence submitted by Kww


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * IP reblocked for 1 month. Tiptoety  talk 17:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date July 25 2009, 15:20 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Kww

Restoring edit by 83.109.101.239. is an obvious sock of Wiki-11233, as has already been confirmed as a sock. Additionally, after I placed this note on the IPs talk page, Wiki-11233 immediately responded with an unblock request, further confirming the link.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Since the original filing of this report, the anon has blanked Wiki-11233's user page and has nominated it for deletion. Looking at, you can make an evaluation of his level of good faith or competence, depending on how you interpret the behaviour surrounding his unblock requests.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Block log of original account MacMedtalk stalk 19:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * ✅ prior to this request being made. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions

Blocked by EyeSerene. Tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 21:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 6 2009, 16:40 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Basically, the disruption continues with no sign of stopping. I am requesting a hard-block against the IP for a month, and would like to see if there is a range we can block with minimal collateral damage, because I'm not certain if this is the only IP address used by Wiki-11233. Both require a checkuser.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Kww


 * Note: Undid close before archiving:The individual IP was never blocked. The checkuser simply said that a range block was impossible, not that the individual IP shouldn't be blocked. See this for confirmation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 12:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 16:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

A quick look suggests a rangeblock would be difficult; looks to me like we'd need to block an entire country. --jpgordon:==( o ) 17:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

-- Avi (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

-- Avi (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 18 2009, 18:42 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Evidence submitted by Kww

Same article as always: Down (Jay Sean song), with the same edit summary that shouts UPDATE! in all caps:. Same ISP as always: Telenor.
 * WHOIS for 83.109.100.68
 * WHOIS for previous sock, 88.88.172.168
 * WHOIS for previous sock,83.109.101.239

Just a new IP to be blocked.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Oh, sorry. I blocked that IP a while ago, not knowing about this case. Tiptoety  talk 04:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 21 2009, 18:54 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same articles, same edits, same ISP as all previous Wiki-11233 socks. Only edits Jay Sean articles, inserting unreliable charts and dubious claims, screaming UPDATE! in the edit summary. Probably worth the time to semi-protect his target articles for a month or so to see if we can get this to go away.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Kww


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked. Tiptoety  talk 19:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Report date September 2 2009, 17:17 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Same focus on Jay Sean, same fake chart, the "Official Dubai Albums Chart Company". Nearly a WP:DUCK case, but I hate blocking without a checkuser.&mdash;Kww(talk) 17:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Kww
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 17:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

– Yeah, WP:DUCK, no need for CU. MuZemike 18:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Agree. Blocked and tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Report date September 5 2009, 14:53 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Kww

Same IP range as previous Wiki-11233 socks, same editing of Jay Sean articles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked for two weeks by User:Cirt. NW ( Talk ) 18:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I would've said 2 weeks is a little excessive; the range is incredibly large and dynamic. However, not a big deal. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 18:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Strong emphasis on Jay Sean articles, coupled with insistence on adding trivial charts. Wiki-11233's original block was based on edit-warring trivial charts into Jay Sean articles. Appeared after Wiki-11233's indefinite block was reinstated for being unable to conform to editing restrictions. &mdash;Kww(talk) 20:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 20:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


 * - Tiptoety  talk 20:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * ✅. Brandon (talk) 03:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

 * Blocked and tagged. NW ( Talk ) 03:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Pretty obvious: editing out of Telenor, editing primarily Jay Sean articles. IP needs blocked for a couple weeks.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked 1 month. –MuZemike 01:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
WP:DUCK ... anonymous IP from Norway editing nothing but Jay Sean articles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 03:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Just to spell it out, that makes it block evasion. Rhomb (talk) 07:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked 1 week. –MuZemike 19:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Wiki-11233 may be growing a bit stale: a Norwegian editor using Telenor that focuses on Jay Sean articles. His IP range should be quite obvious from the old reports. Qwerty-1004 has been on my radar for a while as probably being Wiki-11233 back again, due to editing focus and style. Tonight, after I removed edits from due to them obviously being Wiki-11233, Qwerty-1004 immediately restored all the edits. It's remotely possible that Qwerty-1004 is a good-faith editor, so I'm requesting a checkuser.&mdash;Kww(talk) 03:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 03:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

– Behavioral evidence clearly indicates that this is Wiki-11233. No CU necessary. –MuZemike 00:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 00:37, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Created right after the autoblocks created when was blocked cleared, and leapt right into editing Jay Sean articles.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 05:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Prute-1 is a case of WP:DUCK, restoring edits by 83.109.101.251 (a Telenor IP) to Tonight (Jay Sean song), and editing only Jay Sean articles. Your1source is a bit dicier: created as the only edit. I think that Wiki-11233 has been at this long enough to know if the sock that creates an article gets traced to him, the article gets deleted, and took this approach to avoid that. Requesting checkuser to verify Your1source, and because Wiki-11233 always has some fairly persistent IPs. Blocking those is always a good idea.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note that "War" was requested by a Telenor IP March 17 at 15:22, and it was created by Your1source 37 minutes later.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 22:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to go ahead and recommend CU for Your1source. Auntie E. (talk) 00:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ that Prute-1 is Wiki-11233 based on comparison to previously confirmed socks (sockmaster is stale). that Your1source is as well. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 16:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Between the name and the exclusive focus on Jay Sean articles, it's a case of WP:DUCK. He tends to have long-lived IP addresses, so an IP block is a good idea, and it's been a long time since we've done a sweep.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 16:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This account has been blocked and tagged. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  16:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:DUCK is fine. A check was done recently and not a big user of sleepers in the past; autoblock should take care of the IP. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 18:59, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Bordering on WP:DUCK. Absolute focus on Jay Sean, similar numeric stream in username. There are more than one Jay Sean fan in the world, so need a checkuser to see if the account is coming out of the same Telenor range that Wiki-11233 always uses.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:11, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 19:11, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm thinking this can probably just be blocked without need for CU. Similar edits to past socks (see for instance, and ,  and , ), same MO, familiarity with wiki-markup, plus the account name of TurboPanda, a past sock of Wiki-11233, all indicate that this is a duck. Previous checks have not turned up sleepers (seems that he creates accounts as he needs them), autoblock should deal with the immediate IP in concern. Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I see nothing more to do. Closing and archiving. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 19:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
WP:DUCK application. Primarily restoring previous socks edits.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Already blocked and tagged, just filling out the paperwork.

Evidence submitted by Kww
Continued recent trend of "Panda" based names, restoring edits from last few Wiki-11233 socks.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Already blocked and tagged. Just filling out the paperwork.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by TFOWR
Per WT:SPI: similar contribs, particularly to PlayStation 3 (see, e.g., here and here. Sounds pretty WP:DUCKy to me, but I'm just messengering this 'ere from WT:SPI. <b style="color:#000">TFOWR</b>idle vapourings 21:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Yeah, you cannot get any more obvious than that. I'll note that the user is literally trying to work around not being able to upload images by getting in 10 edits and thus getting autoconfirmed. Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 21:35, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Alphathon
Signed,  Alphathon TM ( talk ) 13:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Repeat upload of the same copyvio image 60GB_Original_PS3.gif (prev usernames uploaded as 60GB_Black_PS3.gif both here and wikimedia commons) using same flickr account as source...
 * ...and replacing a free image with the copyvio one on the PlayStation 3 article in an infobox (as with previous names Panda.1001  and I'm-Back-1001 )
 * Not sure on the relevance, but the user has also continually copied irrelevant info from PlayStation Move to PlayStation 3, including a non-free image (fair use on PS Move) which while not evidence of sock-puppetry, is disruptive

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked and tagged. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:medium; color:#4682B4;"> E lockid</b>  ( Talk ) 14:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Another "Panda..." account with edits to Playstation, Jay Sean articles, and ModNation racers.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Another point: self-identified as "Øystein Furevik" in this file creation of a now-deleted file, which ties in well with Wiki-11233's normal practice of editing from a Norwegian ISP, Telenor.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:57, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked and tagged, just doing the paperwork.&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Exclusive interest in Jay Sean plus Playstation==Wiki-11233. &mdash;Kww(talk) 16:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Already blocked and tagged, just doing the paperwork.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Playstation, Need for Speed, and Jay Sean. What more do you need? &mdash;Kww(talk) 22:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Already blocked and tagged, just doing the paperwork.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
WP:DUCK case. Jay Sean/ModNation Racers. &mdash;Kww(talk) 15:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Already blocked and tagged. Not closing immediately because the user is protesting his block.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Closing now; the unblock request was declined. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

16 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Maybe-S2U is the last explicitly confirmed Wiki-11233 sock (see User talk:Maybe-S2U, where we discuss terms of the standard 6-month offer). I'm including that to help the checkuser have some fresh IP evidence. Areyoudown is now editing in pretty much exactly the same pattern as the last dozen Wiki-11233 socks. I'd like a checkuser to confirm (partially because being a PlayStation fan isn't a crime in and of itself, so there's a potential for false behavioural matching), and to scan for any sleepers (as there is an odd gap from Jan 17 to Feb 9 in Areyoudown's edit history, and I suspect another account was active during that time). &mdash;Kww(talk) 15:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * - I'm getting some very interesting results. Let me consult another CU before I post my results. Tiptoety  talk 16:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, all of the following accounts are ✅ (mind you, there are more that are technically confirmed but the contribs don't match). Please understand all of these are on a single school IP, so check carefully before taking administrative actions:


 * The IP in question is already softblocked.
 * It should be noted that is, and I didn't do much digging to figure out if the above group is related.  Tiptoety  talk 16:30, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone but Areyoudown was already blocked and tagged: the "Maybe-***" meme was a dead giveaway. Maybe-S2U explicitly admitted being Wiki-11233, so there's no reason to doubt the relationship to the initial sockmaster. Blocked and tagged Areyoudown.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

05 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Clear WP:DUCK case, restoring previously revdeleted edits. Everybody's blocked and tagged, but I think it's time for a sweep. Wiki-11233 is getting more active, and a bit smarter: he tried a sock tag-team to get past me this time.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC) &mdash;Kww(talk) 18:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sleepers? IP block? (probally because he's changed IPs since last report of softblock) -- DQ  (t)   (e)  20:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

No sleepers. The one IP block has been extended and hardened, but the other one is a school IP that has legitimate users on it. –MuZemike 02:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Everyone's blocked, so I'm closing for now. Relist if there are further developments. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

10 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I blocked Wecantdoanythingaboutit as a duck: account created the day after I blocked the last Wiki-11233 sock, primarily editing articles that have been semi-protected due to Wiki-11233's socking. There were a few edits to British film articles that seemed out-of-character, but I chalked that up to an effort to throw me off the track. When Wecantdoanythingaboutit asked to be unblocked, he claimed not to be Wiki-11233, but said that he was Ruth-2013. When I look at Ruth-2013's account, lo and behold, there are edits that clearly match the style of the ones that seemed out of place. Now I'm in a situation that I don't know whether to scold Ruth-2013 for socking, or block Ruth-2013 as yet another sock of Wiki-11233. I need a checkuser to see whether I've tangled things up. One way or the other, I think Wecantdoanythingaboutit's edits were probably on the WP:ILLEGIT side of alternate account usage, so checking to see if there are any more socks wrapped up with her is reasonable if it turns out to be a distinct case from Wiki-11233. &mdash;Kww(talk) 21:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - T. Canens (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above users are technically ❌ to
 * I see no evidence that disproves that and  are related. I have no strong feelings either way, it's.
 * -- Luk  talk 12:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I've untagged Wecantdoanythingaboutit, and started a discussion with Ruth-2013.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I am nothing at all to do with this user. I am disgusted this has been brought up. Do a checkuser on my account if you don't believe me. In fact I will even give admin my number if they wish to discuss this. This is my first and only account. I have a interest in television and edit here for that reason and everything I put on the articles is what I believe to be fact. My name is Ruth Stevenson I live in hartlepool and know nothing at all about the user mentioned here. I have posted on User:Kww talk page also. Wecantdoanythingaboutit appears to have claimed he is me which is not the case. I have been a good editor here. When edit disputes arise I talk to the other users as much as possible and try to sauce most of my edits. What ever Wecantdoanythingaboutit has said about me is a complete lie I am really annoyed and upset about this.(Ruth-2013 (talk) 17:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC))

Also I will say for a fact I am nothing to do with wiki-112233 either. Ruth-2013 is my only account. Complete a check user on my account. I am innocent of what I am been accused of. If you would like to discuss this further on the telephone let me know and I will give you my phone number. (Ruth-2013 (talk) 18:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC))


 * Well, based on that response, I'm leaving Wecantdoanythingaboutit blocked. There's no good-faith analysis that results in him claiming to be Ruth-2013 to get unblocked while Ruth-2013 disclaims all knowledge of him. I will assume good faith regarding Ruth-2013's involvement.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

08 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same video game focus as Wiki-11233, edit warring over non-free images, as Wiki-11233 has been known to do in the past over PlayStation images. Not quite enough evidence for me to block as a duck, and would feel more comfortable with a checkuser confirming that it's our Norwegian sockpuppeteer again. If things are stale, Wiki-11233 has always edited from Telenor addresses. &mdash;Kww(talk) 13:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - We've still got some useable data here through other socks, so I'll endorse. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears to be a match.  TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  14:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Tagged, blocked, edits reverted.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:33, 8 June 2011 (UTC)