Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WikiDan61/Archive

Evidence submitted by Mykee881222
They only care about the same things. Mykee881222 (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
 * The accuser has been blocked as a vandal and is clearly another sock of  (see ).  Clearly this accusation is baseless.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
GEORGIEGIBBONS is a blocked sockpuppet. WikiDan61 is a respected user of Wikipedia who always does the right thing, which made me mistake him for an admin, so this SPI is practically vandalism. RoboHomo (talk) 17:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
disruptive socking by both the filler and the responder. -- Luk  talk 17:42, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

marked as closed, no action taken by SPI, SpitfireTally-ho! 18:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Mohammed Lieber
hatred for moutray2010 and he is framing him. Mohammed Lieber (talk) 19:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
 * Clearly a retaliatory motion by confirmed sock for my identification of him as a sock of .  (See Sockpuppet investigations/Moutray2010).  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
This is a vandalism attempt by a suspected sock trying to link User:WikiDan61 to other socks of the sock. NtheP (talk) 19:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Case closed par WikiDan61's comment and a few diff checks of my own. I'll leave it for now since it might be used in the other case, but i advice deleting it afterwards par G3. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Disruptive nomination -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 19:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)