Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WikiKing626/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

These two vandalism-only accounts seem to be both solely committed to vandalism of Punxsutawney Phil. LukeSurlt c 09:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Example: and  --LukeSurlt c 11:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * To be honest there's little point reporting these sorts of VOAs at SPI as they can be blocked at AIV regardless of whether they're socks or not. That said, as we're here - moved case to oldest account (, when filing SPIs, please try to file with the oldest account as the master), blocked & tagged, closing. firefly  ( t · c ) 14:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Making the same vandalism to page as the recently blocked accounts. LukeSurlt c 08:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to, plus:
 * Blocked (I had initially tagged, but have deleted them again because I realised that this would probably need moving, and I'm not sure if these are worth tagging in the first place – apologies) . --Blablubbs (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Case moved. Tagged, mainly to correct existing tags as tagging these vandalism only accounts tends to be fairly pointless. In future, WP:AIV tends to offer a faster response where the vandalism is obvious given SPI is expensive. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked (I had initially tagged, but have deleted them again because I realised that this would probably need moving, and I'm not sure if these are worth tagging in the first place – apologies) . --Blablubbs (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Case moved. Tagged, mainly to correct existing tags as tagging these vandalism only accounts tends to be fairly pointless. In future, WP:AIV tends to offer a faster response where the vandalism is obvious given SPI is expensive. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked (I had initially tagged, but have deleted them again because I realised that this would probably need moving, and I'm not sure if these are worth tagging in the first place – apologies) . --Blablubbs (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Case moved. Tagged, mainly to correct existing tags as tagging these vandalism only accounts tends to be fairly pointless. In future, WP:AIV tends to offer a faster response where the vandalism is obvious given SPI is expensive. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Case moved. Tagged, mainly to correct existing tags as tagging these vandalism only accounts tends to be fairly pointless. In future, WP:AIV tends to offer a faster response where the vandalism is obvious given SPI is expensive. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)