Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki hamze/Archive

16 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Hagarblue only becomes active to edit war on behalf of Wiki hamze, most recently in response to Wiki hamze's current block, previously after he was reported at WP:ANEW in 2013: Wiki hamze 1, Hagarblue 1; Wiki hamze 2, Hagarblue 2; Wiki hamze 3, Hagarblue 3). Both accounts are set on removing sourced information about Bahai.  Both accounts assume that anyone who opposes them must be Bahai (Wiki hamze, Hagarblue). Hagarblue also WP:REHASHes Wiki hamze's argument that Bahai is "rare" If not WP:SOCK then WP:MEAT. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I was about to link to his behaviour on the Gulden page, but I see that's already been noticed. The page has little traffic and yet the same unproductive edit was reinstated within an hour. It's extra disruptive to mark disputed edits during an edit war as "minor" (1&2), leading me to believe the User is not here for the right reasons. Here Hagarblue apparently takes offense to a post that was directly aimed at Wiki hamze. Here Hagarblue refers to Wiki hamze as a distinct User who just happens to agree with his views. Both claim to be from Iran, edit the same articles, share views, and do so within short time periods of each other. I think the evidence of both WP:SOCK and its disruptive nature are quite numerous. Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - per provided diffs.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It is the two accounts are socks and, if not, very  they are meat.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, both accounts have carried on merrily edit-warring, so I'm calling it. Hagarblue blocked indef as either a sock- or a meat-puppet, and Wiki hamze as a clear case of WP:NOTHERE topped with either sock-puppetry of soliciting meat-ditto. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

20 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

These three accounts have popped up after the original case was closed, continuing the campaign to demote the Bahá'í Faith from top billing in the Abrahamic religions article. They are obvious socks (heck, one of them even delivered a signed confession), so I blocked them as they appeared. However, Refigh60 and Hamze wiki both snoozed for some eight hours between (almost simultaneous) creation and first edit, which is why I would like a CheckUser to sweep for sleepers. Favonian (talk) 20:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I have more technical data from the master, permitting me to confirm accounts to the master. The following are ✅:
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocks and tags, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)